Letters and Articles on the Republican Party's Agenda
Unless otherwise noted, letters were submitted to the
Lawrence Eagle-Tribune newspaper
Dismantling Public Education
24 Jan 2025
Emily Pearson makes an excellent point about how New Hampshire's
expanded voucher program would severely degrade the quality of
public education (Unlimited Vouchers Will Bankrupt Public
Education, January 19). But, she misses the big picture.
Discrediting and dismantling public education is the whole
point.
For at least the past half century, Republicans have been on a
mission to privatize everything -- including K-12 education.
The entire charter school movement is designed to siphon
resources away from public schools and transfer them to private
ones. The various voucher programs being rammed through around
the country are just the next step. Republicans also have a
Christian Nationalist bent. Hence, diverting funds to Christian
schools. They are also the party of the rich, so reserving a
good education and upward mobility for the already well off
while leaving the "underclasses" behind is consistent with this
bias.
Blocking the above will require a concerted movement. It will
also require finally voting Republicans out of power.
Republican Budget Gifts the Rich and Steals from the Poor
14 Feb 2025
As expected, Republicans in the House of Representatives are
pushing a budget that makes the Trump tax breaks for
billionaires and giant corporations permanent. That will
continue its trillion dollar plus annual deficits into
perpetuity.
Meanwhile, they will pay for that by stealing from the poor and
middle class. It would slash at least $230 billion from food
assistance programs at a time when grocery prices continue to
rise (so much for Trump's "promise" to lower them on day one).
It will also cut $880 billion from Medicare, Medicaid, and the
Affordable Care Act. Cuts to a slew of other programs are likely
also on the chopping block.
Once again, this shows whose interests Republicans actually
represent -- it's not us. Why do people keep voting for them
against their own interests?
Republicans'
Disdain for Our Health & Well-Being
9 March 2025
Your article on how Republicans in the New Hampshire legislature
are considering weakening vaccine mandates demonstrates once
again how they do not actually care about our health and
well-being. Instead, they are using a long refuted conspiracy
theory to gain political points. This is part of a long history
of such opposition to extending access to health care.
In the 1940s, they blocked President Truman from passing
universal health insurance. In 1965, half of Republicans voted
against Medicare. In the 1990s, they blocked President Clinton's
plan. In 2010, they opposed the Affordable Care Act and voted 58
times to repeal it. They got its implementation to be optional.
Then, many Republican-controlled states refused to do so or set
very low income caps.
During the 2020 pandemic, they made wearing masks a political
issue when the science on it clearly confirmed its benefits.
Likewise for the vaccines when they came out, despite their
proven effectiveness against the COVID-19 disease.
Now, the Trump administrations and congressional Republicans are
planning to make massive cuts to Medicare and Medicaid in order
to pay for extended tax cuts for billionaires and giant
corporations. And, they are going after the vaccines that have
all but eliminated numerous dangerous diseases, based on a
falsified and refuted research paper from the 1990s. Note that
there is no major religion that opposes vaccines, so that
fabricated excuse should be eliminated.
Finally, all of this doesn't even get to how they vehemently
oppose any regulations that limit pollution or protect workers
and consumers.
All of this demonstrates how Republicans care more about
political grandstanding to their base than the health and
welfare of ordinary Americans.
New
Hampshire Republicans Rob from Poor to Give to Rich
18 Apr 2025
Thank you to Charles Zoeller for saving me from writing the
letter I planned to on the New Hampshire budget shortfalls and
cuts (Responsibility for NH Revenue Shortage - April 16). But,
he fails to take the next step. Giving more money to the rich
and making up for it by taking services away from the poor is
the heart of the Republican agenda.
Republicans have been waging a war on public schools for
decades. It is the intent behind the formation of charter
schools and the rule that each dollar that goes to one is taken
out of that town's public school budget. It is also why they
refuse to honor the Clairmont decision and transfer the excess
state real estate taxes from rich towns to poor ones. The
current voucher scheme is just the next level assault. Giving
them to religious schools advances the Christian Nationalist
agenda that has ruled the Republican party since Ronald Regan
allied with the Christian Right to create a wedge issue on
abortion.
The cuts to all of the social and environmental programs is just
one more dimension of this agenda.
The needs, desires, and opinions of the public don't matter to
them -- the wealthy and corporations are their real
constituents. Project 2025 is alive and being implemented in New
Hampshire. They even have their own DOGE team. It's time to turn
them out of office.
School
Choice Attack on Public Education
19 Jun 2025
There they go again. New Hampshire Republicans' duplicity in
their campaign to dismantle public education continues apace.
This time it's "school choice."
This plan allows children in low performing schools to transfer
to high performing ones. Unfortunately, the state aid funding
travels with them. Since, in general, lower performing schools
tend to be in poorer communities and the higher performing
schools are in wealthier ones, this further depletes available
resources in the poor districts, creating a downward spiral. It
is effectively a transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich --
typical of Republican economic plans. Thus, we get one more
step in their attack on public schools that they started with
charter schools and their newly expanded private school voucher
plan.
The proper solution is to finally obey the Clairmont decision
and redistribute the excess state education taxes from wealthy
districts to the poor ones. That would do far more to equalize
educational opportunity across the state.
However, Republican policy is to take services away from poor
people and give the money to rich ones, so I'm very pessimistic
that this will happen.
Insidious Big
Ugly Bill
20 Jul 2025
Donald Trump and Republicans have rammed through their Big Ugly
Bill that grants trillions of dollars in tax cuts to their
billionaire donors (that will send our national debt soaring)
and guts the social safety net programs that help the poor and
middle class. But they were very devious and insidious about it.
The cuts to social programs don't take effect until after the
2026 mid-term election. In addition, the tax breaks on tips and
overtime end right after the 2028 presidential election. Their
plan is that people won't start feeling the pain until after
they reelect the Republicans who just shafted them.
Machiavelli's book "The Prince" was supposed to be a warning and
satire. Republicans use it as a handbook.
Grover Norquist Lies about DC Statehood
13 Sep 2025
Good old Grover Norquist is back, spewing his Republican lies
and disinformation (DC Should not Be a State. Ever - Sept. 12).
Norquist is the grandfather of the Heritage Foundation's Project
2025. He has stated that his goal is to shrink government until
it could be "drowned in the bathtub." He was an architect of
President Ronald Reagan's huge tax cuts for the rich and
corporations that created massive budget deficits (that have
been further compounded by subsequent Republican
administrations) and cuts to programs for the middle and working
classes.
Regarding the movement for statehood for Washington, DC, his
assertion that it's to get more Democrats in Congress is a total
Republican canard. The truth is that residents there are sick
and tired of always being at the tender mercies of Congress and
the president, who control their budget and are usually quite
stingy about it. Local police are up to managing crime there as
long as the federal government would let them and the mayor do
their jobs with adequate resources and without interference.
Only a tiny section of DC contains the federal government. That
core could remain stateless. The rest is mostly a normal city
doing normal activities for normal people. Its citizens just
want control over their own fate -- like the rest of us.
Statehood would give them that right.
|